Scientific writing, a neglected aspect of professional training
References
1. Taavitsainen I, Pahta P. Medical writing in early modern English, xix. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 300.
2. Gopen GD, Swan JA. The science of scientific writing. Am Sci. 1990;78:550-8.
3. Shankar PR. What do reviewers look for in an original research article? JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2012;52:95-101. Epub 2013/03/13.
4. Lindsay D. Scientific writing = Thinking in words. Collingwood: Csiro Publishing; 2011.
5. BMJ. Article submission. BMJ Group, 2013 [citado Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission
6. PLOS ONE. PLOS ONE Manuscript guidelines. PLOS one; 2013 [citado Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines
7. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [homepage on the Internet]. Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publications [citado28 Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org
8. Reveiz L, Cuervo L. Implementación de la iniciativa de registro de ensayos clínicos. Rev Colomb Anest. 2011;39:21-6.
9. Gallo V, Egger M, McCormack V, Farmer PB, Ioannidis JP, Kirsch-Volders M, et al. S Trengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:1-16. Epub 2011/10/26.
10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1-34. Epub 2009/07/28.
11. Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Gagnon F, von Elm E, et al. Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:597 e4-608 e4. Epub 2009/02/17.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006-12. Epub 2009/07/28.
13. Vandenbroucke JP. STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK. and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:594-6. Epub 2009/02/03.
14. von Elm E, Moher D, Little J. Reporting genetic association studies: the STREGA statement. Lancet. 2009;374:98-100. Epub 2009/07/15.
15. Patrias K. Citing medicine: the NLM style guide for authors, editors, and publishers [Internet]. 2nd ed. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2007 [citado 27 Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/citingmedicine.
16. Annesley TM. The title says it all. Clin Chem. 2010;56:357-60. Epub 2010/01/02.
17. Annesley TM. The abstract and the elevator talk: a tale of two summaries. Clin Chem. 2010;56:521-4. Epub 2010/02/27.
18. Annesley TM. «It was a cold and rainy night»: set the scene with a good introduction. Clin Chem. 2010;56:708-13. Epub 2010/03/09.
19. Annesley TM. Who, what, when, where, how, and why: the ingredients in the recipe for a successful Methods section. Clin Chem. 2010;56:897-901. Epub 2010/04/10.
20. Annesley TM. Show your cards: the results section and the poker game. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1066-70. Epub 2010/05/22.
21. Annesley TM. Put your best figure forward: line graphs and scattergrams. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1229-33. Epub 2010/06/17.
22. Annesley TM. Bars and pies make better desserts than figures. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1394-400. Epub 2010/07/29.
23. Annesley TM. Bring your best to the table. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1528-34. Epub 2010/08/13.
24. Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument.Clin Chem. 2010;56:1671-4. Epub 2010/09/14.
25. Day RA, Gastel B. How to write and publish a scientific paper, xxi, 7 th ed. Santa Barbara, Calif: Greenwood; 2011. p. 300.
26. Eslava-Schmalbach J, Escobar-Córdoba F. Error aleatorio, sesgo y fraude en las publicaciones científicas. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012;40:91-4.
27. Aldrete A. Plagio y otros traspasos literario-científicos en medicina, en general y en anestesiología, en particular. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39:217-29.
28. Rojas M, Olarte J. Plagio en el ámbito académico. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2010;38:537-8.
29. Rew L. From course assignment paper to publishable manuscript. J Holist Nurs. 2012;30:270-6. Epub 2012/07/26.
30. Coverdale JH, Roberts LW, Balon R, Beresin EV. Writing for academia: getting your research into print: AMEE Guide No.74. Med Teach. 2013;35:e926-34. Epub 2012/12/12.
31. Grindstaff TL, Saliba SA. Avoiding manuscript mistakes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7:518-24. Epub 2012/10/24.
2. Gopen GD, Swan JA. The science of scientific writing. Am Sci. 1990;78:550-8.
3. Shankar PR. What do reviewers look for in an original research article? JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2012;52:95-101. Epub 2013/03/13.
4. Lindsay D. Scientific writing = Thinking in words. Collingwood: Csiro Publishing; 2011.
5. BMJ. Article submission. BMJ Group, 2013 [citado Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission
6. PLOS ONE. PLOS ONE Manuscript guidelines. PLOS one; 2013 [citado Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines
7. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [homepage on the Internet]. Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publications [citado28 Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org
8. Reveiz L, Cuervo L. Implementación de la iniciativa de registro de ensayos clínicos. Rev Colomb Anest. 2011;39:21-6.
9. Gallo V, Egger M, McCormack V, Farmer PB, Ioannidis JP, Kirsch-Volders M, et al. S Trengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:1-16. Epub 2011/10/26.
10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1-34. Epub 2009/07/28.
11. Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Gagnon F, von Elm E, et al. Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:597 e4-608 e4. Epub 2009/02/17.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006-12. Epub 2009/07/28.
13. Vandenbroucke JP. STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK. and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:594-6. Epub 2009/02/03.
14. von Elm E, Moher D, Little J. Reporting genetic association studies: the STREGA statement. Lancet. 2009;374:98-100. Epub 2009/07/15.
15. Patrias K. Citing medicine: the NLM style guide for authors, editors, and publishers [Internet]. 2nd ed. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2007 [citado 27 Feb 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/citingmedicine.
16. Annesley TM. The title says it all. Clin Chem. 2010;56:357-60. Epub 2010/01/02.
17. Annesley TM. The abstract and the elevator talk: a tale of two summaries. Clin Chem. 2010;56:521-4. Epub 2010/02/27.
18. Annesley TM. «It was a cold and rainy night»: set the scene with a good introduction. Clin Chem. 2010;56:708-13. Epub 2010/03/09.
19. Annesley TM. Who, what, when, where, how, and why: the ingredients in the recipe for a successful Methods section. Clin Chem. 2010;56:897-901. Epub 2010/04/10.
20. Annesley TM. Show your cards: the results section and the poker game. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1066-70. Epub 2010/05/22.
21. Annesley TM. Put your best figure forward: line graphs and scattergrams. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1229-33. Epub 2010/06/17.
22. Annesley TM. Bars and pies make better desserts than figures. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1394-400. Epub 2010/07/29.
23. Annesley TM. Bring your best to the table. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1528-34. Epub 2010/08/13.
24. Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument.Clin Chem. 2010;56:1671-4. Epub 2010/09/14.
25. Day RA, Gastel B. How to write and publish a scientific paper, xxi, 7 th ed. Santa Barbara, Calif: Greenwood; 2011. p. 300.
26. Eslava-Schmalbach J, Escobar-Córdoba F. Error aleatorio, sesgo y fraude en las publicaciones científicas. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012;40:91-4.
27. Aldrete A. Plagio y otros traspasos literario-científicos en medicina, en general y en anestesiología, en particular. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39:217-29.
28. Rojas M, Olarte J. Plagio en el ámbito académico. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2010;38:537-8.
29. Rew L. From course assignment paper to publishable manuscript. J Holist Nurs. 2012;30:270-6. Epub 2012/07/26.
30. Coverdale JH, Roberts LW, Balon R, Beresin EV. Writing for academia: getting your research into print: AMEE Guide No.74. Med Teach. 2013;35:e926-34. Epub 2012/12/12.
31. Grindstaff TL, Saliba SA. Avoiding manuscript mistakes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7:518-24. Epub 2012/10/24.
How to Cite
1.
Eslava-Schmálbach J, Gómez-Duarte OG. Scientific writing, a neglected aspect of professional training. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2013 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 2];41(2):79-81. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/787
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2013-04-01
How to Cite
1.
Eslava-Schmálbach J, Gómez-Duarte OG. Scientific writing, a neglected aspect of professional training. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2013 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 2];41(2):79-81. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/787
Issue
Section
Editorial
Altmetric
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
